Verifiable research across tons of documents

Upload files and scans, then ask questions in plain language. NeedleSearch searches your whole archive, checks every answer against its sources, and can run securely on your own servers or through an API.

A sharper way to read a mountain of documents.

A data room should not become a scavenger hunt. Upload it once and ask a plain-language question. NeedleSearch searches the full collection, connects the relevant facts and returns an answer you can check against the original page.

From a pile of files to a checkable answer.

No special query language. Just your documents, your question and a clear trail back to the evidence.

Bring the files. We do the reading.

Upload contracts, scans, PDFs, tables and more. NeedleSearch reads every page, including image-based files, then organises the collection so it can be searched by meaning - not just by an exact word. Your files are encrypted from the moment they arrive.

Ask the question you actually have.

Write it as you would say it to a colleague. In seconds, get a direct answer and the exact page behind it. Need a quick check or a deeper review? Choose the pace. One rule stays the same: answers come only from your documents.

Every claim comes with receipts.

Each finding names the document and page it came from. Preview the original passage, then open the full document in one click.

NeedleSearch handles the hunt. You examine the evidence and make the call. That is exactly how legal research should work.

One question. An answer you can defend.

Most AI tools produce a polished answer in one pass. NeedleSearch investigates first: it searches, checks the evidence, and only then writes an answer with links to the source material.

Typical AI chatbot
Your question LLM Answer

One pass, one prediction. No independent check and no source trail.

NeedleSearch AI agent
Your question Agent Tool 1 Tool 2 Tool 3 Agent Verified answer

The agent searches several routes, checks what it finds, and returns an answer linked to the evidence.

Put to the test on real files.

Same folders. Same questions. Same verified answers. Then we checked every result against the original passage - because a benchmark is only useful when the evidence holds up.

NeedleSearch
multi‑agent
NeedleSearch
single‑agent
Claude Cowork Semantic search Keyword search
Overall98%92%69%55%45%
<100 files97%91%79%50%
>100 files98%93%60%60%
>30,000 files91%89%1%
Accuracy (%) 40 55 70 85 100 10 100 1000 10000 100000 Document count (log scale) NeedleSearch multi-agent · 85 files: 97% NeedleSearch multi-agent · 389 files: 98% NeedleSearch multi-agent · 29131 files: 91% 97% NeedleSearch single-agent · 85 files: 91% NeedleSearch single-agent · 389 files: 93% NeedleSearch single-agent · 29131 files: 89% 91% Claude Cowork · 85 files: 79% Claude Cowork · 389 files: 60% 79% Semantic search · 85 files: 50% Semantic search · 389 files: 60% 50% 91% NeedleSearch multi-agent 89% NeedleSearch single-agent 60% Claude Cowork 60% Semantic search

Multi-agent smart-search holds 89–98% accuracy from 85 to over 30,000 files. Claude Cowork is the only file-reading, non-indexed tier tested — and the only one that drops on the larger collection. It simply can't read everything in time. Index-based approaches, like RAG and smart-search, don't degrade with scale. Note: the two collections used different question sets, so only the ranking of systems within each collection is meaningful — not the size of the gap between collections. Keyword search reflects retrieval recall (150 reformulated queries, exact-fact match), a different metric from answer accuracy, shown here for reference only.

The crucial fact is usually hiding in plain sight.

Hundreds, thousands, sometimes millions of files can stand between a legal team and one decisive clause. The pile grows. The review still takes human hours.

Ordinary search gives you a list of files, not the answer. A general AI chatbot cannot see your private archive. And the decisive story is often scattered across documents no one has read together.

Miss one relevant document, and a routine review can turn into a costly legal risk.

73% of electronic document production costs are document review alone
60% of a lawyer's time is spent on research and complex compliance analysis
$1T+ global legal services market — still largely manual
$40B+ Legal AI market projection by 2034, fastest-growing segment

Built for evidence. Not just eloquent answers.

A good legal answer is more than fluent text. NeedleSearch is built to find, compare and verify what is inside your documents - then make the proof easy to inspect.

01
Parallel agents

Several research paths run at once, each looking at the question from a different angle. Their findings are brought together and checked before you see them.

02
Verified citations

A claim without a traceable page does not make the final answer. You get links to the source, not a request to take the AI on faith.

03
Any scale

From a case folder to a data room with millions of files, the collection works as one searchable body of evidence.

04
OCR built in

Scans, mixed PDFs and image files are read automatically, so an important fact is not lost just because it was not born digital.

05
Hybrid search

NeedleSearch looks for both exact legal language and the underlying idea, so defined terms, clauses and cross-references are easier to surface.

06
Private deployment

Run NeedleSearch on your own servers or private cloud. Documents stay encrypted, and air-gapped operation is available for sensitive work.

07
MCP server

Connect NeedleSearch to Claude, ChatGPT or your own agent through MCP and REST API - without rebuilding the research layer.

Keep sensitive files where they belong.

Run NeedleSearch inside your own infrastructure. Your documents stay encrypted and local; for the most sensitive collections, the platform can operate without an internet connection.

Discuss private deployment →

Two ways to search

Pick the mode that fits how you plan to use NeedleSearch.

Fast
Single‑agent

For the answer you need right now. One focused research pass returns a cited result in seconds - with the same requirement to show where it came from.

Factual lookups  ·  Rapid checks  ·  Draft review

Put reliable research inside the tools you already use.

NeedleSearch can power your product, workflow or AI agent through REST API and MCP. With an API key, your tools can search documents, retrieve evidence and run a full research task - all with the same source trail.

  • REST API with a complete OpenAPI specification
  • MCP server for Claude, ChatGPT and other compatible agents
  • Python and JavaScript client libraries
  • Live, streaming answers via Server-Sent Events
  • Research across collections of several million documents
Compatible with Claude ChatGPT
research.py Python SDK
import needlesearch # Initialize with your API key client = needlesearch.Client( api_key="ns_..." ) # Run agentic research result = client.research.ask( query="termination conditions in §12", mode="standard" ) # Every answer is fully cited for citation in result.citations: print(citation.page, citation.text)

Pricing

Plus
$100
per month
  • All search modes
  • REST API access
Get started
Ultra
$400
per month
  • Everything in Pro
  • Highest usage limits
  • Highest concurrent requests
  • Highest storage
  • Priority support
Get started

The next chapter: research you can trust at speed.

01 Prove It Q2 – Q4 2026
  • Onboard 10–20 law firms & legal departments
  • Achieve product–market fit signal in arbitration & litigation
  • Generate initial ARR; validate enterprise pricing
  • Iterate on agent accuracy and citation reliability
02 Scale It Q1 – Q3 2027
  • Reach 50–100 enterprise clients across EU & US
  • Launch Data Market for proprietary legal databases
  • Introduce integrations (iManage, NetDocs, MS Teams)
  • Raise Series A; expand team to 25–30
03 Own It 2028 +
  • 250+ law firms; expansion to APAC & LatAm
  • NeedleSearch as the de-facto legal AI research layer
  • White-label for top-10 global firms & courts
  • Explore strategic exit or IPO path

The evidence desk.

Read the briefings →

The decisive page should not take days to find.

One question. The right evidence. A clear way to check it.